Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Extraorigami

A new theory that reconsiders basic propositions of cosmology has been outlined according to a review at physorg.com, of a paper published in Physical Review Letters. The idea of Dejan Stojkovic and Jonas Mureika, is that the universe began with just one dimension, and even now, in our three dimensional world, may already be developing a fourth dimension. Quoting the review:

The core idea is that the dimensionality of space depends on the size of the space we're observing, with smaller spaces associated with fewer dimensions. That means that a fourth dimension will open up -- if it hasn't already -- as the universe continues to expand.

The originators of this idea, say their ideas are testable:

If high energies do correspond with lower-dimensional space, as the "vanishing dimensions" theory proposes, researchers working with the Large Hadron Collider particle accelerator in Europe should see planar scattering at such energies.

Their idea, if supported, would help resolve certain problems with current cosmological theory, such as:

Currently, ...[relativity theory and quantum mechanics] are considered incompatible; but if the universe, at its smallest levels, had fewer dimensions, mathematical discrepancies between the two frameworks would disappear.

The mystery of the universe's accelerating expansion. Physicists have observed that the expansion of the universe is speeding up, and they don't know why. The addition of new dimensions as the universe grows would explain this acceleration.

The need to alter the mass of the Higgs boson. The standard model of particle physics predicts the existence of an as yet undiscovered elementary particle called the Higgs boson. For equations in the standard model to accurately describe the observed physics of the real world, however, researchers must artificially adjust the mass of the Higgs boson for interactions between particles that take place at high energies. If space has fewer dimensions at high energies, the need for this kind of "tuning" disappears.

The physicists proposing this say

What we're proposing here is a shift in paradigm,"..."Physicists have struggled with the same problems for 10, 20, 30 years, and straight-forward extensions of extensions of the existing ideas are unlikely to solve them."
"We have to take into account the possibility that something is systematically wrong with our ideas," he continued. "We need something radical and new, and this is something radical and new."

No comments: