Friday, December 28, 2007
There are no jaguar kittens
Before we had xerox machines
Then Google books came along and I had to find something else to worry about. But the article below reminded me of this silly anticipation of mine. Now all I have to worry about is who will scan those cuneiform clay tablets.
(The full article can be seen here)
December 28, 2007
For the past year, a rare early copy of the Declaration of Independence has hung unassumingly in a side hallway at the Supreme Court.
...Where was it before it went on public display?...
Court officials confirmed last week that the 1824 vellum copy had spent seven forgotten years hidden behind a filing cabinet at the Court clerk's office, until it was discovered in 2003, fixed up and displayed for public viewing in 2006.
The copy, one of only 200 made from the 1776 original, would likely fetch $500,000 or more if sold on the open market, according to an expert dealer in historic documents.
The story of the document begins in 1820, when then-Secretary of State John Quincy Adams ordered copies made of the declaration, out of concern about the condition of the 1776 original. The document signed in Philadelphia had been kept in several locations, had been furled and unfurled, and was already beginning to fade.
The future president hired a D.C. engraver named William Stone to execute a small number of copies to be sent to the states, to members of Congress and to the Supreme Court.
Stone used a wet-transfer method that damaged the original further by drawing some of its ink away to make a copy. From the paper copy, Stone made a copperplate engraving that then made a strong impression when printed on vellum, a parchment made from animal skin. The vellum copies were completed and distributed in 1824.
"It is as close to the original declaration as you can possibly get," says Elwin Fraley, a collector and dealer of rare documents who operates History Buff Inc. in Minnesota and Florida. "They give you goose bumps when you see them. They are extremely valuable." Fraley was surprised to hear that the Court's copy was misplaced for such a long time.
The Court's copy had hung in the clerk's office since the building opened in 1935. But when the clerk's office underwent renovations in 1996, an unnamed employee apparently put the document behind one of the office's Lektrievers, which are automated filing cabinets. It was done for "safekeeping," a Court spokeswoman says.
There, Court officials say, it was "forgotten" for unexplained reasons until the curator's office launched a successful search for it in 2003. Once it was found behind the cabinet, some restoration work and reframing was done. In 2006 it was placed back on display, but not in the clerk's office. Instead, it hangs near a ground-floor elevator where it can be viewed by visitors to the Court. The copy is a remarkably vivid rendition of the faded original, which is on view at the National Archives...
Some of the 200 copies are in poor condition and some have fallen into private hands, says Fraley. Within the past year, Fraley says, another William Stone copy of the declaration sold for approximately $450,000. The sale on Dec. 18 of a copy of the Magna Carta for more than $21 million...
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Sunday, December 23, 2007
Money and Art and Drugs
In 2002, gave Poetry Magazine a gift of stock worth more than $100 million. This gift ensures the continuation of a leading proponent of an art which is notoriously poorly rewarded in financial terms. Wallace Stevens, for instance, worked at an insurance company for years to survive. Ruth Lilly, not having to get a job, herself submitted poems for years to Poetry magazine, founded by Harriet Monroe. Independent financial wealth is itself a time honored path of artists, I think of the James Merrill in this category. Lilly's poems were never accepted for publication in Poetry magazine. Her gift though shows a kind of genius. Poetry magazine spent some of their wealth in supporting Garrison Keillor. So keep taking those drugs.
Monday, December 17, 2007
Claude Cahun (1894-1954)
Friday, November 30, 2007
Suddenly we have flowers
From the New Scientist web site, we get this information:
Earlier research had failed to identify the relationships between the major groups of flowering plants, apart from showing that water lilies, a rare shrub called Amborella from New Caledonia, and a handful of other plants were the first to split from the main line of flowering plants. Now Mike Moore at Oberlin College in Ohio and colleagues have gone further.
The team sequenced entire chloroplast genomes for 45 flower species from all major groups, which revealed that five sister groups split off nearly simultaneously. Two groups, the eudicots (including roses, sunflowers and tomatoes) and the monocots (grasses and their relatives), together account for 95 per cent of flowering plants. Magnolias occupy a third group. The two others are less well known
What caused the explosive divergence remains a mystery, although large water-transport tubes may have played a part. Moore notes that the five groups are the only plants with this adaptation.
Okay that's the end of the quote from the New Scientist article. The really mysterious part, though, is not the "explosive divergence." The really mysterious part is that nobody draws a lesson from such events about the limits of human thought.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Mrs. William Blake
My admiration goes to Mrs. Blake, for her accomplishments, this nurturing, this steadying, she accomplished, was the result of totally mechanical forces. No one remembers Mrs. Blake, and yet one has to believe she made William Blakes's productivity greater. As how to classify Blake himself, we may have another post soon on that.